supersam/docs/superpowers
Codex b147d632e8 feat: add role switch login and clean production copy 2026-04-14 23:01:02 +03:00
..
plans feat: add role switch login and clean production copy 2026-04-14 23:01:02 +03:00
skills feat: complete delivery workflow updates 2026-04-13 16:32:18 +03:00
specs feat: add role switch login and clean production copy 2026-04-14 23:01:02 +03:00
README.md feat: complete delivery workflow updates 2026-04-13 16:32:18 +03:00

README.md

Superpowers — Development Workflow System

A set of composable skills for disciplined, high-quality software development. Adapted from obra/superpowers for the Construction Delivery Control project.

Philosophy

  • Design before code — Never jump straight into implementation
  • Tests before code — TDD is non-negotiable
  • Root cause before fixes — Systematic debugging over guesswork
  • Evidence before claims — Verify everything before stating success
  • Review before merge — Catch issues early, catch them often
  • Isolation for focus — Use git worktrees for clean development

Skills Overview

Skill When to Use What It Does
brainstorming Before any creative work Explores intent, requirements, design. Produces a spec doc.
writing-plans After spec is approved Breaks work into 2-5 minute tasks with exact code and paths.
subagent-driven-development Executing a plan Dispatches fresh subagent per task with two-stage review.
executing-plans Executing a plan inline Executes tasks in-session with checkpoints.
test-driven-development Implementing any task RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle. Tests first, always.
systematic-debugging Any bug or test failure 4-phase root cause investigation. No fixes without understanding.
requesting-code-review After tasks, before merge Dispatches reviewer subagent with focused context.
verification-before-completion Before any success claim Runs fresh verification commands before claiming results.
using-git-worktrees Starting feature work Creates isolated workspace on new branch.
finishing-a-development-branch All tasks complete Verifies tests, presents integration options, cleans up.

Workflow: Idea → Production

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                     IDEAL WORKFLOW                          │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                             │
│  1. brainstorming                                           │
│     ↓ (spec doc in docs/superpowers/specs/)                 │
│  2. writing-plans                                           │
│     ↓ (plan doc in docs/superpowers/plans/)                 │
│  3. using-git-worktrees                                     │
│     ↓ (isolated .worktrees/branch-name)                     │
│  4. subagent-driven-development (or executing-plans)        │
│     ↓ (per task: implement → spec-review → quality-review)  │
│  5. finishing-a-development-branch                          │
│     ↓ (merge / PR / keep / discard)                         │
│                                                             │
│  Throughout:                                                │
│  - test-driven-development (every task)                     │
│  - systematic-debugging (any bug)                           │
│  - verification-before-completion (every claim)             │
│  - requesting-code-review (between tasks)                   │
│                                                             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Quick Start

For a New Feature

  1. Tell me what you want to build → I'll use brainstorming
  2. We iterate on the design together → I'll write a spec
  3. I'll create an implementation plan with writing-plans
  4. I'll set up a worktree with using-git-worktrees
  5. I'll execute the plan with subagent-driven-development or executing-plans
  6. When done, finishing-a-development-branch gives you merge/PR options

For a Bug Fix

  1. Tell me what's broken → I'll use systematic-debugging
  2. I'll find root cause before proposing any fix
  3. I'll write a failing test with test-driven-development
  4. I'll fix, verify, and commit

For Code Review

  1. Ask for a review → I'll use requesting-code-review
  2. A reviewer subagent gets focused context (not session history)
  3. Issues are reported by severity and fixed before proceeding

Project-Specific Conventions

  • Test runner: Vitest (npm run test)
  • Linter: ESLint 9 (npm run lint)
  • Build: Vite 6 (npm run build)
  • Test files: .test.js co-located with source
  • Components: Organized by domain in src/components/
  • Services: Pure functions in src/services/, Supabase adapters in src/services/supabase/
  • Worktrees: .worktrees/ directory (already exists and gitignored)
  • Specs: docs/superpowers/specs/
  • Plans: docs/superpowers/plans/

Skill Triggering

Skills are mandatory workflows, not optional suggestions. When the context matches a skill's description, I will announce its use and follow the prescribed process. You can always ask me to use a specific skill by name.

Key Principles

  1. Design before code — Unexamined assumptions cause wasted work
  2. Tests before code — If you didn't watch it fail, you don't know what it tests
  3. Root cause before fixes — Random fixes create new bugs
  4. Evidence before claims — Run the command, read the output, THEN claim the result
  5. Review before merge — Fresh eyes catch what tired eyes miss
  6. Isolation for focus — Clean workspace, clean mind