--- name: systematic-debugging description: Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes --- # Systematic Debugging ## Overview Random fixes waste time and create new bugs. Quick patches mask underlying issues. **Core principle:** ALWAYS find root cause before attempting fixes. Symptom fixes are failure. ## The Iron Law ``` NO FIXES WITHOUT ROOT CAUSE INVESTIGATION FIRST ``` If you haven't completed Phase 1, you cannot propose fixes. ## When to Use Use for ANY technical issue: - Test failures - Bugs in production - Unexpected behavior - Performance problems - Build failures - Integration issues **Use this ESPECIALLY when:** - Under time pressure (emergencies make guessing tempting) - "Just one quick fix" seems obvious - You've already tried multiple fixes - Previous fix didn't work ## The Four Phases You MUST complete each phase before proceeding to the next. ### Phase 1: Root Cause Investigation **BEFORE attempting ANY fix:** 1. **Read Error Messages Carefully** - Don't skip past errors or warnings - Read stack traces completely - Note line numbers, file paths, error codes 2. **Reproduce Consistently** - Can you trigger it reliably? - What are the exact steps? - If not reproducible → gather more data, don't guess 3. **Check Recent Changes** - What changed that could cause this? - `git diff`, recent commits - New dependencies, config changes 4. **Gather Evidence in Multi-Component Systems** When system has multiple components (frontend → Supabase → Edge Functions): - Log what data enters each component - Log what data exits each component - Verify environment/config propagation - Check state at each layer 5. **Trace Data Flow** - Where does bad value originate? - What called this with bad value? - Keep tracing up until you find the source - Fix at source, not at symptom ### Phase 2: Pattern Analysis **Find the pattern before fixing:** 1. **Find Working Examples** — Locate similar working code in same codebase 2. **Compare Against References** — Read reference implementation COMPLETELY 3. **Identify Differences** — List every difference, however small 4. **Understand Dependencies** — What other components, config, environment? ### Phase 3: Hypothesis and Testing **Scientific method:** 1. **Form Single Hypothesis** — "I think X is the root cause because Y" 2. **Test Minimally** — SMALLEST possible change, one variable at a time 3. **Verify Before Continuing** — Did it work? Yes → Phase 4. No → new hypothesis 4. **When You Don't Know** — Say it. Don't pretend. Ask for help. ### Phase 4: Implementation **Fix the root cause, not the symptom:** 1. **Create Failing Test Case** — Simplest possible reproduction 2. **Implement Single Fix** — ONE change at a time, no "while I'm here" 3. **Verify Fix** — Test passes? No other tests broken? 4. **If 3+ Fixes Failed: Question Architecture** — Discuss with human partner ## Red Flags — STOP and Follow Process If you catch yourself thinking: - "Quick fix for now, investigate later" - "Just try changing X and see if it works" - "It's probably X, let me fix that" - "One more fix attempt" (when already tried 2+) **ALL of these mean: STOP. Return to Phase 1.** ## This Project's Debugging Tips - **Vite dev server**: `npm run dev` — check browser console and terminal output - **Vitest**: `npm run test` — full test suite output - **ESLint**: `npm run lint` — catches syntax and style issues - **Supabase**: Check `src/supabaseClient.js` config and `.env` variables - **React errors**: Check browser DevTools console for component errors - **Service layer**: Pure functions in `src/services/` are easiest to debug in isolation ## Quick Reference | Phase | Key Activities | Success Criteria | |-------|---------------|------------------| | **1. Root Cause** | Read errors, reproduce, check changes | Understand WHAT and WHY | | **2. Pattern** | Find working examples, compare | Identify differences | | **3. Hypothesis** | Form theory, test minimally | Confirmed or new hypothesis | | **4. Implementation** | Create test, fix, verify | Bug resolved, tests pass |